The True Allies discussion platform uses a pre-defined system for directing all topics to a viable conclusion.  Conclusions can state any plausable claim accepted by the peer review system presented, but are in all cases deemed a finale to the topic and subsequent discussions. 

The peer review methodology is the heart of the system, whereas a participating discussion member will present an Argument, Contradiction, Hypothesis, or Thesis to the public arena.  With each presentation, supporting media will be expected to vindicate the purpose and claims being presented.  Upon submission, the panel of participating discussion members will be expected to review the materials and further the discussion.

[ The following chart details the flow of actions throughout the system ]